Subscribe NOW

Enter your email address:

Text Message our CEO:


or on twitter

Free Resources

Click Here to learn more

In The Media

Low Interest Rates Set a 5,000 Year, Low

by Larry Chiang on August 15, 2019

By Larry Chiang
Good luck out there if you’re studying Deep Underground Chinese Knowledge [d.u.c.k.]

Brad Lemley (@BradCLemley)
??@NickSzabo4?? Bloomberg’s blithely asserting the “non-weirdness” of something that has not happened in 5,000 years is a pretty unique take:…


Nick Szabo 🔑 (@NickSzabo4)
It doesn’t cost any more to store bits or paper in Europe now than it did when interest rates were positive. The “storage costs” metaphor as a justification for negative interest rates is a whopping falsehood.


gluckq (@gluckq2)
??@BradCLemley?? ??@NickSzabo4?? Reading on negative yields, it’s easy to distinguish the real jurnos from the jackals trying to benefit from robbing the orphans & widows. The real jurnos will mention the coercion against pension funds, etc.; whereas the jackals will try to convince that negative yields are OK.


Brad Lemley (@BradCLemley)
??@gluckq2?? ??@NickSzabo4?? Yes, okay for the big boys who do cross-currency basis swaps, but murderous for, say, pension funds with rules forcing them into these instruments. Negative rates exploit “rule inertia” – the fact that rule makers never imagined such rates would exist.


Nick Szabo 🔑 (@NickSzabo4)
??@BradCLemley?? ??@gluckq2?? They also expose how heavily and disastrously regulated the fixed-income market is. It often departs very far from the ideal free market of economics classrooms, with prices often “signalling” more the consequences of regulations than natural supply and demand.



Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: