{"id":34425,"date":"2025-06-18T16:34:52","date_gmt":"2025-06-18T16:34:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/?p=34425"},"modified":"2025-06-18T12:35:17","modified_gmt":"2025-06-18T16:35:17","slug":"larry-chiang-650-283-8008-wins-and-keeps-winning-in-divorce-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/larry-chiang-650-283-8008-wins-and-keeps-winning-in-divorce-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Larry Chiang, 650-283-8008 Wins and Keeps Winning In Divorce Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"postie-post\">\n<div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"image0.png\" src=\"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image0-18.png\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\">&#8211; Larry Chiang and Jeff Younger&#8217;s post highlights a strategy for selecting divorce lawyers based judicial capture<\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\">We ai search campaign finance records to ascertain which lawyers donate to specific judges &nbsp;This practice reflects on a 2022 study from the American Political Science Review that found judges in states with judicial elections are 10-15% more likely to rule in favor of donors, suggesting systemic bias in family courts.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\">&#8211; The advice taps into a broader context of judicial corruption, supported by a 2018 Justia article noting that 26% of polled state judges admitted campaign contributions influence decisions, aligning with Younger&#8217;s personal experience in a high-profile custody battle with his ex-wife, Anne Georgulas, which drew national attention since 2018.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\">&#8211; Historical data from Illinois, where lawyers&#8217; direct loans to judges led to disciplinary actions, contrasts with the legal loophole allowing donations to campaign committees, indicating a regulated yet potentially corruptible system that Younger&#8217;s post critiques. <meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/p>\n<div dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/i\/grok\/share\/abzCHFi1VGTrQwMu5YMgtdTn7\">x.com\/i\/grok\/share\/abzCHFi1VGTrQwMu5YMgtdTn7<\/a> <\/p><\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"ltr\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"image4.jpeg\" src=\"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image4-24-rotated.jpeg\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"image2.jpeg\" src=\"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image2-28-rotated.jpeg\"><\/div>\n<p><br id=\"lineBreakAtBeginningOfSignature\"><\/p>\n<div dir=\"ltr\">\n<div dir=\"ltr\">&gt;&gt;#cs183law #cs183PQRST&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\">Guys pushed into divorce court by their wives often ask me how to pick a good divorce lawyer.<\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\">Get your judge\u2019s campaign finance report. Select the lawyer or law firm who donated the most to the judge.<\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\">If you have a choice among high donors, choose the one who\u2019s argued recently and won before the judge. You can check that using online case records.&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\">It\u2019s that simple and that corrupt.<\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"AppleMailSignature\" dir=\"ltr\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8211; Larry Chiang and Jeff Younger&#8217;s post highlights a strategy for selecting divorce lawyers based judicial capture We ai search campaign finance records to ascertain which lawyers donate to specific judges &nbsp;This practice reflects on a 2022 study from the American Political Science Review that found judges in states with judicial elections are 10-15% more [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":34426,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34425\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.duck9.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}