Nick Szabo on Risk

Larry Chiang welds a fictitious business degree called a “J.B.A.”. A Jedi in Business Admin does real work street smart work and documents some or none of it exactly like, Mark McCormack did. Neither he nor his mentor, Mark McCormack went to Harvard Business School. But after Chiang’s Harvard Law School keynote, Harvard’s bschool, Harbus, wrote: “What They Don’t Teach You at Stanford Business School”. Better than a credit bureau dispute penned from Oak Brook at #2021MidwestRoad, this entrepreneurship article, “Nick Szabo on Risk” #CS183risk 

by Larry Chiang

Risk. Risk is clear sound computer science analysis of vulnerability minimization. 

These are not my words. These risk insights belong to Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)

	Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)
7/29/17, 1:09 PM ++. Specific patterns of decentralization (not just any kind) minimize vulnerability. Measuring mere decentralization is utterly naive. twitter.com/lwsnbaker/stat…

	:: lawson baker :: (@lwsnbaker)
7/29/17, 11:16 AM Great critique on the lack of objectivity found in @balajis‘ “minimum Nakamoto coefficient” which David rebrands “minimum majority measure” twitter.com/hrdng/status/8…

	Balaji S. Srinivasan (@balajis)
7/29/17, 3:15 PM @NickSzabo4 Right, which is why we explicitly noted that in the post 🙂 Would love to get a list of the specific patterns you think most important. pic.twitter.com/5l6kzactYm

	Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)
7/29/17, 3:21 PM @balajis There is no list. There is only sound computer science analysis of vulnerability minimization vs. pseudoscientific white paper gibberish.

	~m (@mwilcox)
7/29/17, 4:45 PM @NickSzabo4 @balajis Bitcoin is a lot more than computer science. Measuring _competition_ on as many axes as possible enables insight and reaction